I don't know what to expect from this, as intelligence and facts aren't the most important factor in a debate; experience and debating smarts are. Bill Nye is no doubt used to playing an audience, but Ham has more practice at this sort of thing. Regardless of how it goes, I don't think anybody's mind will be changed, and creationists will be even more firmly entrenched in their beliefs afterward, no matter how badly Ham does. Still, I hope Nye slaughters him. The question, however, lends itself well to arguments from ignorance and arguments from incredulity, which people seem to eat up like it was apologetic gold.
![[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/zf86M5L7/extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg)