RE: So I got in trouble
January 30, 2014 at 2:28 am
(This post was last modified: January 30, 2014 at 2:40 am by Angrboda.)
(January 30, 2014 at 2:18 am)Drich Wrote: Derrida was nothing more than a variable (x) in The greater equation. My goal was to identify the equation and not to solve for (x). The fact that I saw identified and then lead you to tip your hand concerning the "logical trap/the greater equation" was the thought process I correctly identified. (Not nessessarly what you were thinking but how you were thinking)
So now you're claiming you don't know what God thinks, only how he thinks. You're getting closer to claiming you're God all the time.
Of course it was a trap. Identifying that it was a trap doesn't tell you what's inside. You claimed the latter. Not the former. A twelve year old knows it's a trap. If you're claiming the same level of knowledge of God's intentions as you're claiming of mine, then you've sprung the trap despite your best attempts to avoid it. If you have no more knowledge of God's intentions than you had of my intentions, then you know nothing of God's intentions.
I must confess, that you think identifying that it was a trap was the point of the question itself is disappointing. The point lies deeper than that. And you haven't scratched the surface yet.
Identified why it's a trap yet? I'll give you another hint. John Searle's essay, "Minds, Brains, and Programs."
Figured it out yet?
Perhaps I should teach your wife privately. She seems capable of the subtlety you lack.
![[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/zf86M5L7/extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg)