(January 31, 2014 at 1:54 pm)Esquilax Wrote:I was actually talking to mini about his failed arguement of tyre. That his city was the thrid or even fourth encarnation of that city (depending on where you start counting.)(January 31, 2014 at 10:53 am)Drich Wrote: Your approach is that of one who believes God will be static through out this process. This is not the case. When you do things right (Follow HIS instructions) He is the that will interact with you. Not me, the writter of your autobiography or anyone else. I'm not selling a religion here. I am trying to put you on a track that bring you directly before God. If God does not have the power or inclination to follow up on what He has promised then he is no god and not worthy of worship.
That's a big ol' dodge, given that we were originally talking about Tyre, and how you've comprehensively failed to "stomp" our contentions regarding it, as you've initially claimed.
His arguement states that the last version of Tyre was the same as Ezekiel's prophecied tyre. It wasn't plain and simple. the two citys share a name, they don't even share the same space.
Jerusalem although is not the same city it was back then, at least it has not moved, and therefore can be identified as the same city. This is not the case with tyre. it foundations were move 4 times making each encarnation a seperate city from the last.
Ezekiel's prophesy did not say there would never be another city name tyre, only that His city would be completely destroyed. it was. The damage was so extensive they could not build where the first city was.
Thus stomping mini's arguement.