So I got in trouble

[Angrboda]

First you claim that the prophecy was fulfilled by the destruction of some of the mainland suburbs which are pictured in a photograph showing modern Tyre behind them (in the thread you linked). Now you're claiming the destruction of Tyre was fulfilled by Alexander's attack of the island city. These are not compatible claims. This is what is known as kettle logic ("I didn't steal your kettle, and even if I did, you owed me."); claiming multiple incompatible things in the hopes that one of the explanations will gain traction. This shows you don't actually know anything about the subject, and are just throwing out ad hoc explanations like you always do. Any port in a storm, eh? Only problem is, this is another flawed way of thinking that leads to conclusions that can't be relied upon to be true. People shun you because you use flawed thinking, not because your conclusions are loathsome. (They are, but it is the faulty way you reach them which makes them unreliable bullshit.)

Logic fail. Prophecy not defended.