RE: Atheists, George Zimmerman and the burden of proof
February 7, 2014 at 3:32 am
(This post was last modified: February 7, 2014 at 3:34 am by là bạn điên.)
(February 7, 2014 at 3:19 am)FlyingNarwhal Wrote:(February 7, 2014 at 1:47 am)Ryantology (╯°◊°)╯︵ ══╬ Wrote: No you fucking didn't. You cannot actually expect anyone to think that 'thug' in this context is not a replacement for 'blacks' when you make a point of identifying the races of the victims.
rasetsu's got you pegged. So does Minimalist. You're a racist and a hypocrite. You've displayed all of the negative behavior of which you've accused me. I'm done. Fuck off.
If he said thug and your mind equated that to black people, then you might be the one with the problem here.
Quite right.
Poor old ryantology
Can't rebut so he claims he is not rebutting because it might 'demean him' and now he is all butthurt because the whole interwebs is not agreeing with him that calling racist thug 'thugs' means that I must think all black people are thugs.
Poor little lambkin.
Some may call them junk, I call them treasures.
