The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old

[WesOlsen]

1. Variable light speeds do not prove the Universe is 6,000 years old; they merely demonstrate that distant starlight in no way proves it is older than 6,000 years.

If only you had some observational calculations to back up that extreme minority viewpoint

2. What on Earth makes you think the Nobel committee does not have their personal biases? That’s laughable.

Everyone has biases, in the same way that you will always flat-out reject all evidence based approaches to everything because you have a pre-determined, biblical based outlook regarding the planet and the universe. Nobel prize judges would simply want to see some studies and/or calculations, neither of which I expect you'll ever actually generate. Maybe you could go for the Templeton prize though, you tick all the boxes for dogmatic devotion to the progression of bollocks all.

No, I merely managed to comprehend it.

Like when you generated 'deductive proof' of god that was acknowledged by absolutely nobody ever. Seriously, if you write a critical thinking textbook I will buy it and add it to my collection, none of the existing textbooks contain the deductively sound case for god so there's a juicy gap in the market. Right-wing American christian cranks are adept at marrying venture capitalism with religious dogma, go for it mate, do it for the children.

I do not know the exact age, but I know a very narrow range.

Sweet as, results please. We'll just need to get it peer reviewed and then we can go get you that nobel prize, yuk yuk.