Atheism destroyed with a question

[Esquilax]

I agree but I never said "you need Jesus" as an argument for Gods existence I tend to focus on the philosophical, moral and cosmological arguments that can apply to many religions.

Ah, so you didn't have a post about two pages back that ended with the sentence "you need some of this," followed by a picture of Jesus?

Moreover, what I'm saying is that the arguments for god that you present are rather thin on the ground, more often than not replaced by simply describing some aspect of what your religion is about.

That's not evidence. It's a story you're telling.

You must be reading some kind of different post in your mind to the ones I actually make then. It's fairly rare that I say anything about Jesus specifically at all.

And here we see a standard christian obfuscation, known as selective focus. Here' Sword has chosen to focus on the word "Jesus" in my above post, rather than responding to the sentiment behind it.

Instead of wasting my time repeating myself, I'll instead just remind you that you know what I mean.

Allah is just the Arabic word for God so I would agree with them. I don't agree about needing Mohammed as the ultimate final word of God though.

And if a muslim came here and kept describing various facets of islamic belief without ever demonstrating or even attempting to provide evidence for them, would you find that convincing?