How can a Christian reject part of the Bible and still call themselves a Chri...
February 13, 2014 at 6:19 am
(This post was last modified: February 13, 2014 at 6:19 am by Rampant.A.I..)
Respectfully, it's not even that. It's acquired and ingrained intellectual dishonesty.
The debate-savvy theist demands disproof for their celestial god-wonder-deity of whatever flavor they've chosen, while demanding immunity from having to provide evidence, because they know evidence of the Heirophany, for or against, is definitionally impossible.
And yet, knowing this, they demand special reverence to their particular invocation of the divine.
Imagine that. A mere human who not only deigns to "defend" the immutability of their own God, define all the characteristics of said God, not only seeing this for the incredible blaspheme it is, but asserts they know more about a divine being than any other human to have ever lived, *including Jesus Christ,* and these people call themselves Christians.
If Christ came back and saw what has been done in his name with his word, if it wasn't already: His hair would curl.
The debate-savvy theist demands disproof for their celestial god-wonder-deity of whatever flavor they've chosen, while demanding immunity from having to provide evidence, because they know evidence of the Heirophany, for or against, is definitionally impossible.
And yet, knowing this, they demand special reverence to their particular invocation of the divine.
Imagine that. A mere human who not only deigns to "defend" the immutability of their own God, define all the characteristics of said God, not only seeing this for the incredible blaspheme it is, but asserts they know more about a divine being than any other human to have ever lived, *including Jesus Christ,* and these people call themselves Christians.
If Christ came back and saw what has been done in his name with his word, if it wasn't already: His hair would curl.
