The Modal Ontological Argument - Without Modal Logic

[Whateverist]

I've never heard a coherent description and certainly not a consistent one. So do you know what it is or not?

sure.
1. he is an omnipotent, omniscient, morally perfect immaterial mind.

Oh sure because those are so common. We're always coming across immaterial minds. It only stands to reason that one of them would be perfect and uber uber. Sorry I doubted you.

2. relative to our reality, he is everywhere, outside himself he is nowhere for nothing exists apart from him (which means all of us and our reality are constructs of his thoughts).

Now you're just pulling our legs, right? You can't point to one so .. he's everywhere. Right.

3. irrelevant. if he is coherent he exists according to this argument.

Well there you go then. He obviously does not exist.