RE: Atheists, George Zimmerman and the burden of proof
February 15, 2014 at 11:38 pm
(This post was last modified: February 15, 2014 at 11:38 pm by là bạn điên.)
(February 15, 2014 at 4:11 pm)Isun Wrote: Actually there is no confusion about the stalking rule. I just pointed out that your definition is wrong. I didn't say that Zimmerman stalked him. You might try comprehending what you read better.
Bullshit. Itw as claimed that Zimmerman 'stalked' Martin and its nonsense
Quote:And you have no idea if that is true about Martin. We only heard Zimmerman's side and guess what. We can be sure he lied through his teeth. But there wasn't evidence enough to say otherwise. Because Zimmerman killed the boy.So he isn't guilty
Quote:As to whether blacks are more likely to do crimes? I suspect that whites committ as many crimes as blacks do. Blacks just get convicted more often.
![ROFLOL ROFLOL](https://atheistforums.org/images/smilies/roflol.gif)
I su[ppose they just dopn;t investigate murders committed by white people.
Some may call them junk, I call them treasures.