Atheists, George Zimmerman and the burden of proof

[là bạn điên]

Oh its now cold blooded murder. How did it become cold blooded murder? What was the PROOF that murder was committed, not 'lets spin a theory ,fit any evidence we have into it then decide that that theory is undoubtedly the truth and convict someone on it'.

Right, and OJ is still looking for "the real killers".

Why is it your standard of proof is so much higher when it comes to what's right in front of your face?

You have proof that there was COLD BLOODED murder. Please share it with us.

---

You are full of it I pointed out that, you don't have to hide to be considered a stalker, but I also mentioned that this case didn't rise to that level. Next time read instead of jumping to conclusions.

I am sure they investigate a lot of crimes committed by whites, but as a black man you are more likely to be convicted and more likely to be arrested. More likely to get the death penalty. It goes on and on and on.

I stated quite plainly that there was a legal and non legal definition. the non legal involves moving unobserved in pursuit of prey (such as when stalking a deer) the legal involves Repeatedly following a person with intent to harrass or distress. neither applied to Zimmerman. this 'Stalking' accusation is a pathetic attempt to pretend that by following Martin Zimmerman was somehow breaking the law.


Once again. lets deal with murder directly. Are you claiming that black people are statistically no more likley (in the USA) to commit murder than white people?

Do you think more white people are murdered by black people in the US or more black people are murdered by white people.

What about rape- are more black women raped by white men or are more white women raped by black men? No word games or misdirection please.