RE: The Modal Ontological Argument - Without Modal Logic
February 17, 2014 at 8:48 am
(This post was last modified: February 17, 2014 at 8:49 am by Rational AKD.)
(February 17, 2014 at 8:02 am)StuW Wrote: I'll just leave this here...perhaps you should relearn the definition of triangle...
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spherical_geometry
Quote:Triangle- A closed figure consisting of three line segments linked end-to-end. A 3-sided polygon.
http://www.mathopenref.com/triangle.html
Quote:Polygon- A number of coplanar line segments, each connected end to end to form a closed shape.
http://www.mathopenref.com/polygon.html
that "triangle" as you call it certainly is not comprised of coplanar line segments... and you can even tell the lines aren't strait yet you seriously think it's a triangle? it resembles a triangle, which is why they call it one, but it is not a triangle.
I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with senses, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use and by some other means to give us knowledge which we can attain by them.
-Galileo
-Galileo