RE: Where did the universe come from? Atheistic origin science has no answer.
February 22, 2014 at 7:38 am
(This post was last modified: February 22, 2014 at 7:43 am by Mystical.)
(February 14, 2014 at 1:25 am)snowtracks Wrote: in this physics paper, Disturbing Implications of a Cosmological Constant, it says on the page 2 that "Some unknown
agent" initially started the inflaton. wonder what that's all about?
http://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-th/0208013v3.pdf
http://gizmodo.com/our-universe-might-ju...1410271260
Scientists are proposing a radical new way of think about how the universe began. In a new imagining of the Big Bang theory, they think it could have been the result of a four-dimensional star collapsing in on itself to form a black hole, which then proceeded to spew its guts out and, kindly, form our universe.
The standard Big Bang theory has some limitations. The singularity—the idea that everything came from essentially nowhere—is one of them. The fact that the universe is at an almost uniform temperature is another, because that doesn't square with the speed at which the universe has expanded. So physicists often ponder alternative theories that could explain the origin of our universe.
And that's just what Niayesh Afshordi, an astrophysicist with the Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics in Canada, has done. Here's, roughly, what he proposes:
Canada, has done. Here's, roughly, what he proposes:
So, according to the theory, our universe is the vomited-up guts of a 4D black hole. The expansion of the event horizon explains our universe's expansion; the fact that its creation stems from another 4D universe explains the weird temperature uniformity. You can take a second to process all that, it's okay.
Of course, it's speculative; it's pretty tricky, after all, knowing for sure what happened at the birth of our universe, and the work's yet to be peer reviewed, but the researchers think it has promise. There's nothing comforting in the notion that we're all just spatters of stellar vomit. [arXiv via
Snowy, you saying 'Atheists don't believe in gods' is like if I said 'Snowy doesn't believe in Bigfoot'.
Of course we don't believe in things we cannot confirm with reality.
Show me legit physical proof in our physical world for Bigfoot and I'll believe in Bigfoot.
If I were to create self aware beings knowing fully what they would do in their lifetimes, I sure wouldn't create a HELL for the majority of them to live in infinitely! That's not Love, that's sadistic. Therefore a truly loving god does not exist!
Dead wrong. The actions of a finite being measured against an infinite one are infinitesimal and therefore merit infinitesimal punishment.
I say again: No exceptions. Punishment should be equal to the crime, not in excess of it. As soon as the punishment is greater than the crime, the punisher is in the wrong.
Quote:The sin is against an infinite being (God) unforgiven infinitely, therefore the punishment is infinite.
Dead wrong. The actions of a finite being measured against an infinite one are infinitesimal and therefore merit infinitesimal punishment.
Quote:Some people deserve hell.
I say again: No exceptions. Punishment should be equal to the crime, not in excess of it. As soon as the punishment is greater than the crime, the punisher is in the wrong.
![[Image: tumblr_n1j4lmACk61qchtw3o1_500.gif]](https://66.media.tumblr.com/5fb74c6d16622fb3dbb358509c9aec03/tumblr_n1j4lmACk61qchtw3o1_500.gif)