The universe appears "old", but it is still less than 10,000 years old

[JuliaL]

---

Among lots of other drivel,(tl;dr)
Happens all the time. Technology has moved past the bronze age.

per google's dictionary
vir•gin
ˈvərjən/
noun
noun: virgin; plural noun: virgins
1.
a person, typically a woman, who has never had sexual intercourse.

Also from google's dictionary
ar•ti•fi•cial in•sem•i•na•tion
noun
1.
the injection of semen into the vagina or uterus other than by sexual intercourse.

Most of the milk supplied in American markets comes from virgin cows who have calved and freshened without intercourse.
Virgin birth isn't so hard to replicate [b]these days. I am interested in the semantic gymnastics you have to offer to explain how this simple and obvious fact is somehow in error. I don't expect it to change your arbitrary, axiomatic presuppositions.
Maybe no woman has ever been artificially inseminated without having somehow first been fucked?

---

1. This is irrelevant because Old-Earth Christians believe the virgin birth was a result of the immaculate conception- which is a supernatural event and not some means of artificial insemination.
2. Are you really going to argue that 1st Century Jews had late 19th Century technology? Really? If not, then this was irrelevant for a second reason.

I'll take "moving the goalposts" for 500.
My comment was in response to your question:

Really? What evidence is there that a virgin can give birth?

Why did you ask that question if you weren't suggesting that virgin birth could not be easily explained.
If you had intended to ask, "What evidence is there of a magical impregnation," you could, and perhaps should, have done so.
With respect to your second claim of irrelevance; What difference does it make what technologies were available to first century Jews? Some event was reported as miraculous which clearly could have had several simpler explanations.
You still get full marks for the mental gymnastics necessary to retain the mystical when the mundane would suffice.



ME!