LastPoet, I'm trying to make out on how you are addressing my argument. Are you suggesting it's irrational for example, if we had souls, to have a sense that we have a soul, to be able to sense we have a soul or spiritual existence beyond physical and to know that? Why would it be irrational if that's the case? It seems like weak Atheism depends on strong Atheism to be held rational. Instead of clinging to both stances as possibilities, it seems to rely on the assumption God doesn't exist, therefore is not knowable, or that a soul doesn't exist, thus we have no sense of a soul.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 15, 2025, 3:52 pm
Thread Rating:
Why Agnostic Atheism may not be the most logical stance.
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)