Why Agnostic Atheism may not be the most logical stance.

[Mystic]

LastPoet, I'm trying to make out on how you are addressing my argument. Are you suggesting it's irrational for example, if we had souls, to have a sense that we have a soul, to be able to sense we have a soul or spiritual existence beyond physical and to know that? Why would it be irrational if that's the case? It seems like weak Atheism depends on strong Atheism to be held rational. Instead of clinging to both stances as possibilities, it seems to rely on the assumption God doesn't exist, therefore is not knowable, or that a soul doesn't exist, thus we have no sense of a soul.