RE: Why Agnostic Atheism may not be the most logical stance.
March 1, 2014 at 8:19 pm
(This post was last modified: March 1, 2014 at 8:24 pm by Mystic.)
(March 1, 2014 at 8:04 pm)jesus_wept Wrote: I'm not really sure what the point the op is trying to make is, is he saying that it's more logical and rational to believe there is an invisible and undetectable dragon in my garage than it is not to believe because there is a possibility that there really is an invisible and undetectable dragon in my garage?
I already dealt with this sort of argument. In the case of God existing, there is a possibility there is a way of knowing he exists. In the case of your undetectable dragon, there is none.
Anyways, read in the argument I am making instead of making your own version of what I'm saying. I don't see the need of repeating myself.
My argument also never states which one is the most logical stance. I'm stating it's not necessarily that agnostic atheism is the most logical stance, and from the agnostic atheism (weak atheism) perspective, that shouldn't be hard to admit. That it's possible it's not the rational stance out of all of them.
