Why Agnostic Atheism may not be the most logical stance.

[jesus_wept]

I'm not really sure what the point the op is trying to make is, is he saying that it's more logical and rational to believe there is an invisible and undetectable dragon in my garage than it is not to believe because there is a possibility that there really is an invisible and undetectable dragon in my garage?

I already dealt with this sort of argument. In the case of God existing, there is a possibility there is a way of knowing he exists. In the case of your undetectable dragon, there is none.

Anyways, read in the argument I am making instead of making your own version of what I'm saying. I don't see the need of repeating myself.

I think there is as much chance of the unknowable (invisible and undetectable) dragon existing as there is your unknowable god. In much they same way that there is also a slim chance that fairies exist because it's impossible to know for certain they dont, perhaps there is a hedgerow or fairy ring somebody hasn't examined thoroughly and they live there?

And it's not my dragon.

http://www.godlessgeeks.com/LINKS/Dragon.htm

I read the argument btw and it didn't make much sense to me, still doesn't if I'm honest, hence the reason I asked for clarification.