(March 5, 2014 at 8:44 am)Aractus Wrote: The problems with the Big Bang Cosmology is that it still requires "empty space" to exist (and as we know empty space doesn't exist, thus it requires something to exist as the starting conditions and not nothing), and that the mechanism for the imbalance between matter and antimatter has yet to be theorized let alone observed (theoretically you need some kind of subatomic particle that buzzes around and prevents antimatter from forming or if there's some fundamental difference between the two states of matter). It also requires a single state of matter, a concept incompatible with general relativity as we know it, and also theoretically incompatible with QM.
That thinking is so 20th Century. There are several large voids in visible space. Some are nearly a billion light years in diameter. They are completely empty of visible material. If you could live long enough you would see those voids create hydrogen and then stars.
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn12...xf7M0p-_-s
The Big Bang is simply a Catholic theory of creation. It's silly.
