(March 2, 2014 at 1:14 pm)Esquilax Wrote:(March 2, 2014 at 1:06 pm)StatCrux Wrote: The problem for atheists is that his position is logically consistent with atheism, its the atheists that try to maintain that intentionality, meaning, purpose in life etc are consistent with atheism that have the problem. I agree with Rosenberg, I just wish other atheists would face the problem and admit that's logically where you end up, empty, meaningless and pointless existence
Individually and socially determined meaning is still meaning, it's not invalid because some other people decided to label theirs extra special and omniscient. A lake has no intentionality either, that doesn't sap all the joy out of swimming in it.
You're trying to erect a problem where there isn't one.
You really are clueless about the infinite regress of getting meaning from something else that gets its meaning from something else, etc.
