RE: Overstating the case for Athiesm.
March 8, 2014 at 12:14 am
(This post was last modified: March 8, 2014 at 12:19 am by rsb.)
(March 8, 2014 at 12:11 am)Minimalist Wrote: Nonetheless, when jewish scholars point to their books and say "this is what they mean" it has to count for a bit more than these asinine xtian interpretations which turn the "suffering servant" ( meant to be Israel ) into friggin' jesus. Xtians pick a line out of the text and say "Yup... THERE'S JESUS" and the jews say "Bullshit." I've got to go with the jews.
Sorry, I disagree, I only believe archeologists that old. As far as I am concerned that whole era is rightfully prehistory.
If a jew or other person says bullshit on a factual basis, they may be right if their facts are right, if they say so based on their stupid theology, they are just stupid.
On a related basis, what evidence do you have that Ra (the Egyptian sun god) was not real in jewish theology. We are almost ready for the age of aquarius baby, the 12th cycle on the myan calendar is upon us, lets here what the jews have to say about that to disprove it. Or perhaps we can constrain ourselves to facts.
Lest get naked in the sun to worship Ra!
