(March 10, 2014 at 9:48 pm)Heywood Wrote:(March 10, 2014 at 9:40 pm)rasetsu Wrote: That doesn't change my point any.
You have no logical justification what so ever to choose that point for your boundary other than your own unsubstantiated speculation that the universe was at one time smaller than a Planck length.
If you're going to choose the beginning of the life cycle of a human as a data point, it only makes sense to choose the beginning of the life cycle of the universe as the other data point. It's called being consistent. Instead, you choose an arbitrary time during the life of the universe, and an arbitrary time during the life of a human, and an arbitrary scale to measure it on. Therefore, your result is simply arbitrary; it means nothing because you've chosen the values without rhyme or reason.
![[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/zf86M5L7/extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg)