RE: Objective Morality, Anyone?
March 18, 2014 at 9:13 pm
(This post was last modified: March 18, 2014 at 9:15 pm by bennyboy.)
(March 18, 2014 at 7:35 pm)Shaykh al-Kabir Shair Abdulrab Wrote:"Morals" is just a word. In a physical monist determinism, the behaviors and ideas that are "moral" are just a part of the chain of causation, as is our decision to associate the word with them.(March 18, 2014 at 6:34 pm)bennyboy Wrote: They're all objective. We just experience them subjectively.
Are you sure you wish to make that claim? So you are telling me that morals are actually observable concepts or actions?
All our evaluations of things are a product of DNA interacting with environment. This includes feelings like love, a sense of duty, and even the superstitious sensations that lead some people to "feel" that a God really exists. If you claim that we have an ability to establish mores subjectively, you are implying free will-- but if you are choosing a substance dualist view of free will, you are invoking faith as a foundation to an argument-- and idea that won't fly among non-religious minds.