Objective Morality, Anyone?

[bennyboy]

So you propose that morals are objective then turn around and state that they aren't?
:angel-cl

Never happened.

I think there are some hidden equivocations here on what "subjective" means. If subjective means only that someone is experiencing a moral idea with a sense of agency, then every more is subjective. If it means that someone has arbitrarily chosen a more through actual free-will, then every more is probably objective, since "true" free-will (i.e. one which is causally independent of both the DNA and the environment) cannot be demonstrated.

Let me ask you this-- is the DNA a part of the self, or is the self supervenient on the DNA?