RE: Objective Morality, Anyone?
March 19, 2014 at 10:55 am
(This post was last modified: March 19, 2014 at 10:57 am by Mudhammam.)
(March 19, 2014 at 10:52 am)tor Wrote:(March 19, 2014 at 10:50 am)Pickup_shonuff Wrote: It sounds like it was formed out of the vacuous belief that the King had special powers rather than merely filling the position of overseeing the general peace.
They can say same thing about your value of human happiness and call it vacuous. They think kings authority is important and to keep it intact they must burn people who fuck with it.
I wouldn't call it moral but it has some thinking behind it.
And they're entitled to whatever opinion they want. Why? Presumably because they value their opinion, which is exactly the grounds for morality I'm talking about. Their opinion is not intrinsically better or worse than mine so any action involving two parties must account for both. In other words, the person who wants to kill has no business with the person who doesn't want to be killed.
