Proving god with logic?
March 21, 2014 at 6:50 pm
(This post was last modified: March 21, 2014 at 6:55 pm by Rampant.A.I..)
(March 21, 2014 at 1:55 pm)ChadWooters Wrote:(March 21, 2014 at 1:39 pm)Rampant.A.I. Wrote: There are no existing syllogisms that logically prove God exists. There are variations of Aristotle's unmoved mover, most notably the KCA, but all begin with premises that aren't supported by other logic, or are conclusions masquerading as premises.
Circular logic.
Not so. Modern analysis usually misinterprets archaic usage of certain terms of Aquinas' 5 ways.
Which ones
What are the proper archaic usage of each word in each argument and how are they logically any more consistent than the KCA?
(March 21, 2014 at 6:03 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: God can be proven with logic. Whether he has been proven by logic or not, is a different question.
Some of the greatest minds who've lived have tried for 2000 years to come up with working arguments unsuccessfully.
The only arguments produced so far rely on presuppositions that aren't supported, i.e. begging the question.