One philosophical argument for existence of supernatural.

[Mystic]

Well, what I'm saying is at one point knowledge of objective value would be preceded simply by a sense of a value (life forms valuing their existence and survival). Praise would also be preceded with a sense of praise before an actual knowledge of objective praise. As evolution works, there doesn't need to be an actual knowledge of value or praise neither does our concept of ourself have to be accurate, as opposed to simply an experience and sensation of these things. At the very least with naturalism, we can't know for certain they are with a basis, which means we would not know them having an objective reality. I'm arguing we are grounded in knowledge of these things, hence, naturalism is not true.