RE: The first Christians weren't Bible Christians
March 23, 2014 at 10:21 am
(This post was last modified: March 23, 2014 at 10:22 am by Phatt Matt s.)
(March 23, 2014 at 10:14 am)Belev2Know Wrote: T:What the Fuck!
ya need a little more info.
i may not write so well, but
please get some of the 5500 documents pre 4th century things in view...
"the church" is universally="catholic" in understanding that word - in as a core, any as Peter who believe on the revealed knowledge of 'a calling' - "not revealed by that of flesh"
-have not even delved here into the 'received text' of say the KJV english from the greek nor the new translations 'wescot horte nestle's ' or the like and why it was older but seemingly unused... of the Grk.
another place for more study as well:
Grad of Kings College, Philosophy, etc, many years a teacher of Hebrew and Greek and more...
the late Derek Prince , and others have quite a different view if history as yours is...
unashamedly still today such things as before the 4th century Cannon's, etc's. are still examples of the Rock of the building of the universal Church... and always 'rediculous' to many as you have judged visions and receiving revelation
http://www.openheaven.com/library/articles/prince.htm
still seems in question: What was the CHURCH before the 300's, to you; but this is not a question to historical science
You should be a comedian!
