(March 30, 2014 at 4:19 pm)ChadWooters Wrote:(March 30, 2014 at 4:06 pm)Pickup_shonuff Wrote: When one gets the same result postulating that "magic is fundamental" in place of "God is fundamental," it becomes clear that A) the statement is meaningless and B) it (magic or God in this case) tells us nothing about what is supposedly fundamental.Or energy or quantum foam...we already accept many things as fundamental. The objections are like saying energy doesn't explain anything.
The burden is on you to justify why we should start at God as a fundamental law. If you know anything about energy and quantum foam, you'd understand scientists didn't begin with those ideas and work their way out from there but arrived to such theories via the experimental data.
