RE: Question for the theist
March 31, 2014 at 1:14 pm
(This post was last modified: March 31, 2014 at 1:22 pm by xr34p3rx.)
(March 31, 2014 at 8:04 am)alpha male Wrote:(March 31, 2014 at 7:27 am)tor Wrote: Too bad that you disagree with science.Not necessarily. I can't find consensus definitions of science or scientific evidence. They mean different things to different people, including among those who call themselves scientists. I choose a definition which is more restrictive than some.
so you disagree even with the evidence in your face. that's sad man. evidence is not a matter of semantics like what the vast majority of religious people do, they twist the meaning of the word so it fits with their claims and views and don't consider what it really means according to the subject . in this case science. evidence is evidence, something to fall back on to prove something. but there are strong (undeniable) evidence and anecdotes which is Christian evidence.
(March 31, 2014 at 8:35 am)alpha male Wrote:(March 31, 2014 at 8:24 am)tor Wrote: Lets hear your definition.Let's hear yours.
and please PLEASE stop redirecting questions to the asker, just answer the frekn question
(March 31, 2014 at 8:35 am)alpha male Wrote:(March 31, 2014 at 8:24 am)tor Wrote: Lets hear your definition.Let's hear yours.
and also, science isn't subjective it's objective
xR34P3Rx
it isn't in our nature to think of a God, it is in our nature to seek answers and the concept of God is most influenced in this world.
it isn't in our nature to think of a God, it is in our nature to seek answers and the concept of God is most influenced in this world.