Question for the theist

[Fidel_Castronaut]

You're asking too much, unfortunately.

You're being insulting, but really I have to agree with you. Yes, when I'm in a debate, it certainly is asking too much of me to go and do the other side's work. Asking that reeks of desperation, and that's when other atheists pop in out of the blue with insults.

No, not quite. You're presented with evidence but disregard the evidence based conclusions.

You've said 'I agree that we have found 'x' evidence', but then disagree with the hypothesis that said evidence best fits for 'god created something and then something happened and then HUMANS''

It's puerile, and it's nonsense, and it shows why debating scientific advancements and scientific discoveries with someone who wants to be a religious based contrarian is a fools errand.

---

Case in point john. I've gone back through this thread and read every single post you've made. Not once, when challenged about why you disagree with the inferences drawn from things like (for example) fossil records or common ancestors do you give an answer.

Not a single reply. Neither do you offer anything substantive about your own conclusions based on said evidence, nor do you explain at how you arrived at them.

So, like I said, fools errand. There is no debating with someone who refuses to quantify anything that they believe/disagree with but who rather simply objects at everything presented to him.