RE: Question for the theist
April 1, 2014 at 7:18 am
(This post was last modified: April 1, 2014 at 7:22 am by John V.)
(April 1, 2014 at 1:36 am)Esquilax Wrote: Not like you, eh? Not like you, when you found two people who support- tacitly- the opinion you already had before looking for them. Because those two people, the fact that they have differing opinions invalidates all the evidence and somehow means that the vast scientific consensus in favor of evolution and common ancestry somehow evaporates, right?No, those examples invalidate the specific claim made by my opponents.
Quote:This cherry picking of data is a little sad, don't you think? You'll pull out a couple of sources that support you, while ignoring the context surrounding them. But sorry dude, science isn't just done based on one or two opinions.Fine, give some evidence that supports the position that morphology and genetics give the same results. I asked for it some time ago, and all I got was a drawing from wiki.
(April 1, 2014 at 3:32 am)Fidel_Castronaut Wrote: The 'article' cited by john, specifically the the Kevin Peterson one, actually isn't an article. It's a non-academic review article that hasn't actually been followed up with a publication (in nature anyway) that I can find, although I only had a brief search through nature's archives.What do you think of the support that my opponents have provided?
