Question for the theist

[Esquilax]

Fine, give some evidence that supports the position that morphology and genetics give the same results. I asked for it some time ago, and all I got was a drawing from wiki.

The same results? No, of course not. But convergent results that point toward a similar conclusion? Yes. I could see you trying to twist the conversation into a black and white statement of absolutes with your "always the same," phrasing, safe in the knowledge that nobody would be able to produce absolutely identical results, and therefore you can cram you god into that uncertainty, but I'm not going to play that game. Instead, I'm going to argue the real position:

Morphology and genetic research provides evidence that points to a certain conclusion, and adding in an extra layer of complexity with "kinds" or what have you, that has no evidence at all, is not really worth discussing.