Question for the theist

[John V]

Actually, I'm pretty sure that's what you accused your opponent of thinking, and he just didn't pick you up on your wording.

Here's what was said: "fossils and genetics all lead to the same thing, its there, the evidence is there but why do you deny it?" I've cleaned up the terminology but have not distorted his position.

Of course, he can speak for himself and, given that I disagree with the point you're attempting to disprove too, I don't see much point in bringing that up to me.

Given that you disagree with the point I'm attempting to disprove...why are you butting in? This seems to be a blatant admission that you're throwing in red herrings.

Yes, I get it, most scientists believe in evolution. If some of us want to discuss specific claims within evolution, what's that to you? I have not claimed that this specific issue invalidates all of evolution.