Question for the theist

[Esquilax]

Given that you disagree with the point I'm attempting to disprove...why are you butting in? This seems to be a blatant admission that you're throwing in red herrings.

I have a problem with people trying to poke holes in existing science, as though that validates some other thing. A more direct route through this conversation would've just been to provide evidence for your initial claim.

Yes, I get it, most scientists believe in evolution. If some of us want to discuss specific claims within evolution, what's that to you? I have not claimed that this specific issue invalidates all of evolution.

That's what I'm saying: instead of discussing evolution, you're just sat here providing problems with it, which is counter-productive given that you did have a claim, in the beginning.