Question for the theist

[John V]

I have a problem with people trying to poke holes in existing science, as though that validates some other thing.

I didn't claim that the error in his position validates some other thing. You're reading that into my posts.

A more direct route through this conversation would've just been to provide evidence for your initial claim.

That's what I'm saying: instead of discussing evolution, you're just sat here providing problems with it, which is counter-productive given that you did have a claim, in the beginning.

My initial claim in the beginning was:
Most creationist models include some evolution.

Do you really dispute this, or are you referring to something else?