Question for the theist

[xr34p3rx]

why don't we do this. alpha male. you claimed that everything is designed but rephrased it. provide evidence that the world
is designed. you haven't proven anything but try to disprove our evidence that we have actually provided. so provide something. it's really a waste of time debating someone who doesn't stand by and defend their views without even trying to provide some evidence.

You asked for an alternative explanation and I gave a possibility. I don't consider ID or creationism to be provable. If you don't like the focus to be on your own claims, then go ahead and stop debating. Won't bother me at all.

i never asked for an alternative nor a possibility, my post was:

How do you account for the different races in humanity if your god created only 1 pair of humans in the beginning? wouldnt that require some evolution even if you dont agree with the theory completely?

saying god made it that way doesnt count, that is an assertion and you have to back it up anyway.

however you said:

Things that are designed and have similar appearance and functions will have similar blueprints.

you claimed that design took place, you havent mentioned anything regarding your claim after countless times i have asked you to do so. Along with not providing any argument other than wanting our evidence and you just sit back and deny all of it without making a constructive argument. And as i told you before, it seems like you dont have any argument, you are just another smug believer who thinks you have it right and your opinion is more important and more reliable than real evidence on the subject. You deny because our evidence doesnt match with what you think is evidence? When... WHEN did you ever explained what you find as evidence? you never defined what you believe is evidence. Youre just like ray comfort.

Show me design. until you do so, i wont bother replying...