Question for the theist
April 1, 2014 at 3:10 pm
(This post was last modified: April 1, 2014 at 3:19 pm by Rampant.A.I..)
(April 1, 2014 at 12:35 pm)alpha male Wrote:(April 1, 2014 at 12:11 pm)xr34p3rx Wrote: why don't we do this. alpha male. you claimed that everything is designed but rephrased it. provide evidence that the worldYou asked for an alternative explanation and I gave a possibility. I don't consider ID or creationism to be provable. If you don't like the focus to be on your own claims, then go ahead and stop debating. Won't bother me at all.
is designed. you haven't proven anything but try to disprove our evidence that we have actually provided. so provide something. it's really a waste of time debating someone who doesn't stand by and defend their views without even trying to provide some evidence.
So you actually offered nothing as an alternative. It's nice that you recognize ID is unscientific because it's untestable and unprovable, but you didn't even point to something you find compelling.
You have no evidence, no theory other than "man didn't evolve from a common ancestor of apes because I don't like it" and nothing to back up your assertions other than "I don't understand evolutionary biology, paleontology, or genetics: the scientists who do must be wrong, because I don't think we share a common ancestor with apes."
Quote:[New Latin Primates, from Latin, plural of primat-, primas] : any of an order (Primates) of mammals that are characterized especially by advanced development of binocular vision, specialization of the appendages for grasping, and enlargement of the cerebral hemispheres and that include humans, apes, monkeys, and related forms (as lemurs and tarsiers)
The only thing you've advanced is "everyone is wrong because I don't like their conclusions."
http://www.askmen.com/top_10/dating/top-...ale_6.html