RE: Question for the theist
April 1, 2014 at 3:28 pm
(This post was last modified: April 1, 2014 at 3:33 pm by John V.)
(April 1, 2014 at 3:03 pm)xr34p3rx Wrote: i never asked for an alternative nor a possibility, my post was:No, I responded to that post by saying:
Quote:How do you account for the different races in humanity if your god created only 1 pair of humans in the beginning? wouldnt that require some evolution even if you dont agree with the theory completely?
saying god made it that way doesnt count, that is an assertion and you have to back it up anyway.
however you said:
Quote:Things that are designed and have similar appearance and functions will have similar blueprints.
Quote:Yes. Most creationist models include some evolution.It's in this post. Why are you misrepresenting the conversation?
Quote:you claimed that design took place, you havent mentioned anything regarding your claim after countless times i have asked you to do so. Along with not providing any argument other than wanting our evidence and you just sit back and deny all of it without making a constructive argument. And as i told you before, it seems like you dont have any argument, you are just another smug believer who thinks you have it right and your opinion is more important and more reliable than real evidence on the subject. You deny because our evidence doesnt match with what you think is evidence? When... WHEN did you ever explained what you find as evidence? you never defined what you believe is evidence. Youre just like ray comfort.In this post I specifically said that I don't accept creationism:
Show me design. until you do so, i wont bother replying...
Quote:I don't think origins is a study that lends itself well to scientific study, i.e. I don't buy either side. They take the same observable facts and try to hammer them into their existing framework. Sometimes it's a good fit, sometimes not so much.
You're trying to force this into a discussion on creationism because you've failed miserably at supporting your evolution claims, but I've said straight out that I don't consider creationism to be provable.
Let me use another post just to make this clear: I do not consider ID or any other flavor of creationism to be provable. If I mention design it's as an opinion, not a scientifically provable fact. Got it?
