Question for the theist

[xr34p3rx]

i never asked for an alternative nor a possibility, my post was:

however you said:

Things that are designed and have similar appearance and functions will have similar blueprints.

No, I responded to that post by saying:

Yes. Most creationist models include some evolution.

It's in this post. Why are you misrepresenting the conversation?

later on you said that. when you said designed, what were you referring to then?

you claimed that design took place, you havent mentioned anything regarding your claim after countless times i have asked you to do so. Along with not providing any argument other than wanting our evidence and you just sit back and deny all of it without making a constructive argument. And as i told you before, it seems like you dont have any argument, you are just another smug believer who thinks you have it right and your opinion is more important and more reliable than real evidence on the subject. You deny because our evidence doesnt match with what you think is evidence? When... WHEN did you ever explained what you find as evidence? you never defined what you believe is evidence. Youre just like ray comfort.

Show me design. until you do so, i wont bother replying...

In this post I specifically said that I don't accept creationism:

I don't think origins is a study that lends itself well to scientific study, i.e. I don't buy either side. They take the same observable facts and try to hammer them into their existing framework. Sometimes it's a good fit, sometimes not so much.

now you are contradicting youself, you first said that you agree with things that scientists say and what creationists say, which one is it? you were cherry picking.

You're trying to force this into a discussion on creationism because you've failed miserably at supporting your evolution claims, but I've said straight out that I don't consider creationism to be provable.

---

Let me use another post just to make this clear: I do not consider ID or any other flavor of creationism to be provable. If I mention design it's as an opinion, not a scientifically provable fact. Got it?

i gave you evidence, i gave you all that, and i say yet again, you have not done any of that, you dont accept real evidence because of your ignorance. its unbelievable! and yet again, you dont provide anything, shifting the argument like i have not shown anything, you dont agree with it, because you are ignorant