RE: Why did god create diseases?
April 3, 2014 at 4:08 pm
(This post was last modified: April 3, 2014 at 4:14 pm by Chas.)
(April 3, 2014 at 3:54 pm)fr0d0 Wrote:(April 3, 2014 at 3:43 pm)Chas Wrote: That's not how it works. There is no 'built-in propensity' for lower birth rate. The only 'natural population control' is death.
Birth rates are partly a function resources, as is infant mortality.
Populations of animals are often cyclic, boom and bust phenomena.
Lower birth rates are a statistical fact of a developed society. One of Bill Gate's points for ending child poverty is that giving people enough food results in smaller families.
A population fat on resources becomes lazy > needs to try less to survive > reverses the rules of natural selection
The bust and boom phenomena makes the point better... a species exceeds it's resources and dies back... it's a natural control. It's how nature works and that's pretty damn cool.
Like I said... dissatisfaction with that makes you a fantasist.
The lower birth rates of developed societies is explained sociologically, not biologically.
The boom and bust cycles of animal populations has nothing to do with birth rates - it has to do with death rates. It's about resources.
This is well illustrated by predator/prey cycles:
![[Image: predators-vs-prey.png]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=www.magictraders.com%2Fsites%2Fwww.magictraders.com%2Fimages%2Fpredators-vs-prey.png)
Also well illustrated by disease cycles. An epidemic of disease will kill off enough of a population so that the population density will no longer support the disease transmission. The disease organism population subsides, the victim population rebounds - just like a predator/prey cycle.
Your fantasy is invalid.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Science is not a subject, but a method.