Sye Ten debate tactics

[tor]

His argument in a nutshell:

"Ha ha, you admit you don't know everything and therefore Jesus"

As far as I can tell, the goal is to pack as much stupid into a short argument so the density will be so great that is will collapse in on itself, becoming a black hole of idiocy and will suck in and devour all rational arguments within its event horizon.

It's simpler than that: he just calls epistemological "first", as if he can claim ownership over the very concept of knowing things, and then expects everyone else to go along with his childish "it's mine now!" tactic, and bow to the additional bare ass assertions he makes. You don't have to, but as long as he refuses to answer any questions then he can walk away thinking we had no answer, and therefore he must be right.

So, argument from ignorance + being an asshole = Sye Ten Bruggencate.

Doug Wilson did same against Hitchens.
"We are fizzing like 2 bottles of matter if atheism is true. Who is winning the debate? Nobody! We are just fizzing! If atheism is true nobody can know anything and therefore jesus is our saviour".
Give me a break.