This is precisely the problem I have with all ontological arguments as well.
It attempts to place what are inherently subjective beliefs into the confines of an objectively applicable formula, and then to further add onto the railway to disaster, goes the extra mile to declare the conclusion as unavoidable. The resulting presuppositional mess is predictably riddled with as much holes as swiss cheese.
It attempts to place what are inherently subjective beliefs into the confines of an objectively applicable formula, and then to further add onto the railway to disaster, goes the extra mile to declare the conclusion as unavoidable. The resulting presuppositional mess is predictably riddled with as much holes as swiss cheese.
freedomfromfallacy » I'm weighing my tears to see if the happy ones weigh the same as the sad ones.
