Where did the universe come from? Atheistic origin science has no answer.

[snowtracks]

the error the atheist make is a presuppositional belief that the future- discovery-gap will explain things; if the supernatural is ruled out before the investigation, that's a belief not an argument. additionally, science has limited range. for instance: the question, does good ultimately prevail over evil?

But that's just it-- we have plenty of examples of scientific discoveries that explained things we did not know or understand, and not a single one of them involved supernatural beings or forces. None. Not a one. Zip. Zilch. Nada.

The next discovery that we can directly attribute to god --or any other supernatural force or being-- will be the first. Based on that track record, why would you claim that the atheist is making the error in expecting that trend to continue?

here's a hypothetical question: if the biblical God has existence, is there any scientific phenomenon that couldn't be explained as being a product of creation?
i personally didn't come with anything, but maybe you can.