RE: Suggested Rule
April 30, 2014 at 5:30 pm
(This post was last modified: April 30, 2014 at 5:33 pm by Revelation777.)
(April 29, 2014 at 10:54 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote:(April 29, 2014 at 10:47 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: I do not want to debate Esq. I would like to appeal to the masses. For people to turn to the Lord before it is too late.
Translation: I can't keep up the shuck and jive in a one on one debate.
Do you honestly think there is anyone here who isn't on to your bullshit (besides you, that is)?
huh?
(April 29, 2014 at 10:58 pm)SteelCurtain Wrote:(April 29, 2014 at 10:47 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: I do not want to debate Esq. I would like to appeal to the masses. For people to turn to the Lord before it is too late.
But the masses have a unified voice saying you are unappealing. Do you not think your message would be more concise and palatable if there were one chain of responses rather than 50?
Oh, if there be but one that would believe, it'd be so worth it!
(April 30, 2014 at 10:50 am)Esquilax Wrote:(April 30, 2014 at 10:46 am)Revelation777 Wrote: My goal is to present 7 arguments. After that I'll reconsider your offer.
So hurry up and post number two, I could do with some fodder.
Fodder - no; meat -yes.
