RE: The theist evolution argument
May 2, 2014 at 9:54 am
(This post was last modified: May 2, 2014 at 9:55 am by Zen Badger.)
(May 2, 2014 at 9:47 am)Jason_ab Wrote: No, he doesn't, he quotes two guys Barem and Tippler.
I think I could agree that the odds of evolution to human from natural selection were extraodinary slim. Don't misinderstand what I am saying, OF COURSE the evolution theory is valid, the argument is whether it was possible without devine superintention.
It is a quite big video, the specific argument is articulated at 56:27 from Craig.
The interesting fact is that he got no answer from Hitchens.
You seem to be under the impression that humans are the inevitable consequence of evolution.
In this, you are mistaken.
Yes, the chances of humanity evolving as we did are extremely slim. And such is the case for every other species alive.
But all that means is that chance fell our way, nothing else.
![[Image: mybannerglitter06eee094.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i118.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fo112%2Fpussinboots_photos%2FBikes%2Fmybannerglitter06eee094.gif)
If you're not supposed to ride faster than your guardian angel can fly then mine had better get a bloody SR-71.