(May 6, 2014 at 9:21 am)Godslayer Wrote: Sounds like a you problem. You disagreed with me that he wasn't explaining God B when he made up a God D because he wanted to duck the challenge.I'm the one who made the God D, so I don't know why you're referring to me in the third person. The purpose of my initial post was to suggest ways to improve the OP. The purpose wasn't to duck, as I believe in an A god.
Quote:If something can't be verified, then it accounts for nothing. That is the only real goalpost there, if a thing can't be verified or detected to some degree it's indistinguishable from something nonexistent until there is said evidence to verify it.IMO the Christian god has been "verified or detected to some degree." You have different criteria for detection and/or verification. THat's about all there is to it.
