(May 6, 2014 at 4:38 pm)Heywood Wrote: This case was not about Christians getting their way. This case was about Christians keeping their way. Remember this suit was originally brought by atheists to stop a pre-existing practice.
Yes, and for Southerners, one major driver for fighting against the North was about keeping their "way", i.e, slavery. Nothing like tradition!
Pre-existence of a practice is no argument for the validity of that practice; nothing more than the fallacy of an argument from tradition.
In the US, the standard must be is the practice constitutional or not?
Hey, if Christian jackasses want to display their delusional buffoonery in public, I'm fine with it, as long as everyone else gets equal access and time.
