(May 7, 2014 at 3:01 am)Heliocentrism Wrote: A is the nature of god when someone recovers from an illness.
B is the nature of god when there's a natural disaster.
C is the option "Bullshit!"
I'm going with option c.
This is not a pick your god game though. Also, I disagree with you on your summations of Gods A and B. Recovering from illness is not proof of a gods manifestation in reality, since we have natural remissions of illness. To your second point, if a god was real, you could theoretically find said god's manifestation in natural disasters. Which is why I'm asking them how they can tell the difference between a god who does not manifest or interact or is detectable etc. and a god who does not exist. The theists here will try to say the right god is God A, however they have no way of showing that their god manifests itself into our reality in any way. If some god was twiddling the nobs of reality, it would leave a trail, we would be able to detect it, it would be verifiable.
If the hypothetical idea of an afterlife means more to you than the objectively true reality we all share, then you deserve no respect.