RE: Proving the Bible
May 10, 2014 at 8:28 am
(This post was last modified: May 10, 2014 at 8:34 am by Chas.)
(May 8, 2014 at 2:33 pm)lordofgemini Wrote:(May 8, 2014 at 2:29 pm)Kitanetos Wrote: One should not simply accept anything without the proper evidence to support its existence. First it must be proven to exist before any real debate can begin.Yep. And that's what I was proving...
No, you were failing miserably.
(May 8, 2014 at 4:18 pm)lordofgemini Wrote: Step one was universe cannot as itself be eternal.
Assertion without evidence.
Quote: I went through all that, to prove there must be only one thing that can be eternal. Call it whatever u like. This is the evidence of God.
That is not evidence.
Quote:(apart from history that men came claiming to be prophets throughout the history till Prophet Muhammad. And they got scriptures that talk about many many things claiming to be from God e.g The Origins of the Universe, Clouds, Mountains, Deep Seas and Internal Waves, Seas and Rivers, Human Embryonic Development, The Cerebrum, who could claim all that)
And I dont want to discuss about religion BTW.
Good, because we'll hand you your ass on a platter.
Quote:As for your theory is easily debunkable. Make any theory other then the existence of an eternal God it will be easily be debunkable.
Assertion without evidence. You have not demonstrated this.
Quote:Your universe itself is subject to time so there must be a start.
This version seems to have required a start. However, if there was a singularity then there was no time 'before' there was this universe. That singularity may have always existed.
Quote:How did it start. What was the first cause that it did even start leave alone perpetuate. You theory is still inside that logical loop, that leads us to nowhere. This itself is proof that your theory is wrong. There must be something that was always there. In the equation if the universe.
The correct answer is that we don't know. Including you.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Science is not a subject, but a method.