(May 22, 2014 at 6:39 am)Heywood Wrote:(May 22, 2014 at 3:55 am)Losty Wrote: Yes I know. That's not the first time. Even in this thread. I'm asking a genuine question about his thoughts on abortions for mothers who would otherwise die and he comes back first with, oh I don't believe in it. Then I ask if women should be forced to die rather than abort just because he doesn't believe that happens? And his answer is some bullshit about Beccs committing suicide because she doesn't like me??? Wtaf?
The first time he ignored a question I asked, what his criteria is for being a human being.
Heywood is the almighty picker and chooser of what is and is not a human being, but he refuses to state what his criteria for being human being is.
Read the exchange. You asked about late term abortions. Aborting at a late term isn't any more dangerous then delivery in the modern age(a point I made which you ignored and then ranted about how cruel I am to force women to die....etc).
I didn't ignore the point. I pointed out that you were wrong.
Quote:The only time I have seen it allowed is when women argue that delivering the baby will cause them to be depressed to the point where they will harm themselves(hence the example of suicide).
I might be wrong, there may be incidences in which carrying a late term baby to term would physically jeopardize the mother. Show me a specific condition where a late term abortion is necessary. Don't say something like "when the mothers life is in danger"....be specific like I was when I mentioned ectopic pregnancies. That way I can look into the condition and tell you what I think.
Are you being serious right now?
Ok, let's say severe preeclampsia.
Also, I notice how you still haven't said why your criteria is for being a human being.